Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:25

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
37 Hidden Gems On Amazon That’ll Make You Think “Where Have You Been All My Life?” - BuzzFeed
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The Forgotten History (and Slippery Science) of Canola Oil - Eater
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
US won't label China a currency manipulator amid tariff war - AP News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Review | In its third season, ‘The Gilded Age’ is as staid and sudsy as ever - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Eveniet dolor unde ut ut praesentium ut aperiam.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
As a teacher, what's the most inappropriate experience you've had with a student?